Artist Statement

On the first day of class in film 150 we were told that we would be working with a local non-profit organization involved with foster children in order to research a topic of our choosing and create a blog. From that day forward, I knew that it would be a journey to get to the point of a finished product that would be both interesting to me and the readers of this blog.

My idea to focus on the psychiatric health of children in foster care came following my first interview with a CASA volunteer named Susan. Going into the interview I had no clue as to what I wanted my main topic for this blog to be. I began by asking general questions about the program and found myself constantly drifted away from my prepared questions and back to the changes of the children both socially and psychologically. I Left the interview knowing that I had found my topic of interest, Psychological change in foster children. As the days went on, I began to research on the broad topic, looking for something that would allow me to look more in depth into the problem. My research led me to an article from the Associated Press via MSNBC online. In this article I found what I was looking for, a major problem that I would be able to take a strong stance on. Prior to this point in the semester, my fellow classmate David and I had been working together on a topic relating to changes in children when they transition into the system. Although this was also an important problem, I never connected to the material that I researched. My new topic, the overuse of psychiatric drugs, was both intriguing and thought provoking. The topic, while very specific, has aspects that cover many different social and political arguments. The main beneficiaries of this legal, large scale drug use are the drug companies which represent corporate America. The companies are not alone however, it seems as though Psychiatrist have no other options available to them but prescription drugs. The reason for this is largely financial and is pushed forward by parents and case workers who are ill-equipped to deal with children with anger problems. A vicious cycle has been created that involves courts, foster parents, mental health professionals, and drug companies. The main losers in this cycle are the foster kids that have already been through mental and physical abuse. The interviews with Aisha and Andrew helped to enlighten the average person, like myself, about the failure of the foster care system to properly diagnose and treat and mental issues that children in the foster system may have. While these online interviews did enable me to further understand the mentality of a foster child, a firsthand interview was required for this blog. For this in person interview David and I spoke with a man named John who was a foster parent of a two year old boy. While this interview didn’t contribute to my topic, I gained valuable information about the foster care system in general. Overall, my experiences with Kids Matter and my research on the topic of psychiatric drug use in foster children has given me insight on one of the most important issues facing the foster care system today.

Why is This Happening?

This is an easy The prescribing of psychiatric drugs to a large portion of the foster care population does not benefit most of the children who are forced to take them. Although most children don't benefit, there are a number of people who do benefit. Foster parents are placed into an unbelievably difficult position because they need to care for a child that in many cases has anger problems and acts out. Due to these difficult circumstances, the foster parents seek the quick fix. Psychiatric drugs are an alternative to counseling, which would take months and results would come little at a time. So the easiest solution for the parents is to allow these drugs to be prescribed and administered to the children. Most children who see psychiatrists are then told that they have a " problem" and are often given drugs the help them cope with this "problem." It is very difficult to gauge what percentage of these children actually need these drugs because such a large number of them are prescribed. The Psychiatrists and drug companies benefit from drugging foster children financially. In 2007, drug companies made about 37.9 million dollars on psychiatric drugs given to foster children. The psychiatrists benefit because for every child they see and prescribe to, they receive money from the government through public health programs such as medicaid. As we know from the recent scandals on wall street, financial benefits outweigh moral obligations in most cases. These three groups all rely on each other which has created the current dangerous cycle of over drugging foster children.

Interview with Foster Children- Aisha

Although i have watched a half dozen interviews with former foster care children, I have chosen to blog about two specific cases. The first was Andrew's interview, where he tells the story of his addiction to psychiatric drugs. My most recent post is an interview with a girl named Aisha, who goes more in-depth about her interactions with psychologists and her opinions and personal experiences regarding the widespread use of drugs in the foster care system. I chose these specific interviews because each focuses on different issues within my topic.

Aisha was placed into a foster home that had 13 kids living in it, all of whom were taking large doses of medication. Aisha was the only child who was not on drugs when she moved in, but soon after, she was prescribed 200 mg of Prozac, an anti-depressant, as well as a 200 mg of Seroquel, a drug for bi-polar disorder. She was prescribed the pills the first time she went to the psychiatrist he told her that she was depressed because didn't interact much with other children in the home. In order to make make her "fit in" she was prescribed the anti-depressant and the Seroquel was used to regulate her sleep within the house. She claims that the Seroquel would knock her out within minutes. The side effects of these pills were evident to her when she couldn't stay awake at school.

The most intriguing part of Aisha's story comes when she talks about her experience with psychologists throughout foster care. She dreaded her regular meetings with the doctor because she claimed that he places too much of an emphasis on drugs. The first and last thing that the doctor mentioned at her meetings was "how are the drugs?" and "are the drugs working." It was obvious to Aisha by the doctors attitude that the drugs were the most important thing to the doctor. She didn't know how to answer the questions and the fear that she would receive a higher dosage forced her to keep her negative feelings about the drugs to herself. According to Aisha, the fear of a higher dosage arose when she saw the way the other foster kids in the home were acting on the drugs, she never wanted to be like that. She was helpless because she was placed into a system in which she has no choice but to take the pills. There was no alternative for her because she felt that the doctors relied on the drugs to fix any problems and believed a higher dosage or new drug could solve anything. As i mentioned previously, only 3% of mental health professionals are trained to deal with the issues that foster children have, so in an effort to save time and resources, foster children are predetermined to have mental health issues and are prescribed drugs that will mask the problem in the short term while proving to be detrimental in the long term.

Aisha eventually sought counseling, and she claims that ,in just a short period, it has helped her more than any drug ever did. Both foster parents and doctors are looking for a quick fix and these drugs provide that fore both groups. When only considering that fact that all 13 of the children in Aisha's home were on psychiatric drugs, it is obvious that the foster care system is far too reliant on drugs.

Interviews With Former Foster Kids- Andrew

The drugging of foster children is one of the most important issues in the foster care system. Throughout my research of the topic I encountered many cases such as Andrew's. Andrews case is similar to cases of many children in the foster system. Andrew was placed into the foster care at the age of sixteen for unspecified reasons. He describes himself as an intelligent individual who was placed into a foster home environment in which taking psychiatric drugs was the norm. Andrews story is troubling because he quickly became a drug addict who was determined to do anything for drugs, including gang banging and fighting. Many foster children like Andrew are prescribed drugs as soon as they enter the system even though they have no prior experience with psychiatric drugs.
Andrew directly blames the drugs for his downward spiral because as he claims in the interview, "the drugs took over me." There are also several other instances in which he places the blame on the system that made him take the drugs saying "It wasn't my fault" "I'm not the one who wanted them." These quotes are extremely meaningful because it is coming from someone who's life was changed by his exposure to drugs at the age of 16. At this age, most people can think rationally about their actions in particular what they put in their bodies; so when he naturally questioned his need for the drugs he was told that he needed to take them or else he would get in trouble or have mental issues. Ironically, prior to taking the drugs he had no history of violence or instability and the drugs led to addiction, which in turn caused the exact problems that he was told they would prevent.
Andrew's story makes me question the reasoning behind the mass drugging of foster children. These children are told that they need to take the drugs because it will benefit them and keep them out of trouble. As you will read in my upcoming posts there are many people are benefiting from prescribing psychiatric drugs to foster children